We design KPI frameworks, metric definitions, reporting structures and decision rhythms that connect business questions to trusted data and accountable action.
Most businesses that arrive here have plenty of reporting, and very little confidence in it. Open any symptom for the decision underneath it.
We define the metrics that matter, with a single agreed definition for each, tied to commercial outcomes rather than activity.
We design how reports are structured, sourced and produced, replacing slow, error-prone manual assembly with consistent, documented reporting logic.
We plan which executive, department and operational dashboards the business actually needs, and the specific decisions each one exists to support.
We establish the reporting rhythm and decision process, so numbers are reviewed on schedule and acted on, not just produced.
We map where data lives across your tools and identify the tracking, analytics and data quality gaps that undermine trust.
Every function makes different decisions on a different rhythm. Each needs its own metric, cadence and owner. The reporting system is designed backwards from decisions like these.
Outcome and driver metrics reviewed monthly and quarterly: performance, capacity and pipeline in one trusted view.
Acquisition cost and channel contribution reviewed weekly, with attribution rules agreed before the debate starts.
Pipeline movement and conversion leading indicators on a weekly cadence, owned by the person who can act on them.
Operational and guardrail measures on a daily and weekly rhythm, with thresholds that trigger action before the breach.
Diagnostic and retention indicators reviewed monthly, connected to the follow-up they should trigger.
Diagnostic before prescriptive: the decisions define the metrics, the metrics define the reporting, and only then does anything get built.
We begin by listing the decisions leadership, marketing, sales, operations and customer teams actually need to make. A report that doesn't support a decision is noise, so the decisions define everything that follows.
We review your existing reports, dashboards, spreadsheets and analytics: where the numbers come from, why teams disagree on them, and where trust broke down. Data quality findings surface here, not after a build.
We design the KPI architecture (outcome, driver, leading indicator, guardrail, diagnostic and operational measures) with a single documented definition, data source and owner for each metric.
Definitions only hold if the people who report against them agree. We work the framework through the metric owners across functions, so it survives contact with the first month-end.
We map the data sources, set the dashboard strategy and requirements, and define the decision rhythm: who reviews what, how often, what threshold matters and what action follows. Where Data Engineering or tracking work is needed first, we flag it here.
You receive a prioritised implementation roadmap for the dashboards, tracking fixes, integrations or data infrastructure that follow, scoped so any build, internal or with our engineering team, starts from defined logic.
The core deliverable is a trusted decision framework: what to measure, how to define it, where the data comes from, and how leaders use it.
Better confidence in key business metrics, with fewer reporting errors and fewer disputes over whose figures are right.
When definitions are agreed and reporting is reliable, decisions typically move faster and lean less on instinct.
Less time assembling reports by hand each period, and fewer errors introduced along the way.
Clearer visibility across marketing, sales, operations, finance and customer performance, structured around the decisions that matter, not activity.
Stronger evidence for budget allocation, and better prioritisation of growth, software, AI, operations and marketing investments.
Clearer foundations for dashboards, automation, AI and custom software, built on metrics the business already trusts.
Data & Decision Making is a consulting service for businesses that need to turn scattered information into trusted, decision-ready insight. It focuses on the questions the business needs to answer, the metrics that matter, the reporting structure required, and the decision rhythm needed to act, because dashboards are only useful when they support real decisions and the underlying metrics are trusted.
Discuss your decision systemData & Decision Making defines the decisions. Related services implement the pipelines, dashboards, AI and ongoing support. Select a pathway to see where it picks up.
Owns: KPI logic · metric definitions · reporting structure · dashboard strategy · decision rhythm.
The numbers live in disconnected systems and reporting can't be automated by hand.
Pipelines, warehouses, integrations, reporting-ready datasets.
We define what should be measured; Data Engineering builds the technical foundation that moves, cleans and prepares the data.
Payment Processing Cost Reduction. An ecommerce retailer was losing a significant percentage of revenue to payment processing and invoice platform fees. Web Lifter redesigned the entire sales and payment workflow, replacing Stripe and Paycove with a direct Westpac PayWay integration and a custom-built invoicing platform. The new architecture reduced transaction costs, streamlined operations, and delivered immediate profit improvements without requiring any increase in sales volume.
Read the case“We can't recommend Web Lifter highly enough … a digital partner who could understand our operations, connect the dots between marketing and backend systems, and deliver real results.”
No. This service defines the KPI logic, reporting structure, metric definitions and dashboard requirements first. The dashboard build itself may follow through Kepler, Data Engineering or another implementation pathway.
Established businesses with useful data spread across multiple tools, reports, teams or spreadsheets that need clearer visibility for leadership, marketing, sales, operations, finance, customer experience or service delivery.
No. This is not cosmetic dashboard design. It is for businesses that need reporting to support better decisions. The visual layer comes later, once the logic is right.
It depends on the number of data sources, departments and decisions in scope. This is fixed-scope consulting work, and pricing is confirmed on a scoping call once we understand your current reporting and the decisions the work needs to support.
This service is often most useful exactly then, when dashboards already exist but leadership doesn't trust them, use them, or make decisions from them. We fix the logic underneath.
Yes, depending on access and scope. The focus is not the platform itself, but the business decisions those sources need to support and how their metrics are defined.
The service identifies data quality issues, source gaps, tracking problems and reporting risks. Technical cleanup, pipelines, warehouses and integrations then move into Data Engineering.
Yes. AI reporting, summaries, recommendations and automation are only useful when the underlying data, definitions and decision logic are reliable. Otherwise AI produces confident, wrong answers faster.
Typically a reporting assessment, data source map, KPI framework, data dictionary, dashboard strategy, reporting gap analysis, a decision framework and a prioritised implementation roadmap.
A trusted decision framework showing what to measure, how to define it, where the data should come from, and how leaders should review and act on it.
Data & Decision Making owns KPI design, reporting logic, dashboards and decision rhythm. Business Economics owns pricing, margins, profitability and cost-to-serve. They pair well: one defines the commercial metrics, the other turns them into a reporting system.
This service defines what should be measured and why. Data Engineering builds the technical foundations that move, clean, integrate and prepare the data behind those definitions.
Not the ongoing operation of it. This service defines how marketing performance fits into the wider decision system (the KPIs, definitions and reporting structure) so campaign reporting connects to commercial outcomes rather than activity.
Common next steps include Data Engineering to build the pipelines and datasets, Kepler for governed dashboards, AI Engineering for AI-assisted analysis, Software Development for custom tooling, or Technology Managed Services for ongoing support.