Loading
A calm, non-alarmist health check across the websites, applications, dashboards, automations and integrations your business depends on, surfacing unclear ownership, missing documentation and single-person dependencies before they become outages. It is deliberately not a security audit.
A completed health check reports the systems without clear ownership, the critical documentation and access gaps, the vendor and single-person dependencies, and the support and maintenance weaknesses across your inventory.
It closes with recommended immediate governance actions and relevant Studio templates. A business running on a website, a CRM integration and several automations might find, for example, that every system works, but two of them are understood by exactly one person, with nothing written down behind them.
You inventory your critical systems, then answer structured questions across the governance domains above: ownership, access, documentation, dependencies, maintenance, monitoring, support process, backlog, technical debt, vendors, continuity, security coordination, and roadmap and reporting. Rule-based checks map the gaps and dependencies into a risk inventory and gap scorecard.
The framing is deliberately reassuring rather than alarmist: the aim is a clear picture of ownership and continuity, not fear. It is a governance review, not a technical inspection. No code, infrastructure or security testing is performed.
Results are rule-based guidance generated from self-reported answers. They are directional, not accounting, legal or other professional advice, and a professional review working from evidence may reach different conclusions.
Your inventory is saved as a technology-environment record in your Studio workspace, so it can be maintained over time rather than rebuilt, with periodic prompts to review it and confirm owners. If you later open a support, strategy or engineering enquiry, the inventory can carry into it; it is never shared otherwise.
Usage is measured at a category level (systems inventoried, risk category, completion and reassessment) to improve the health check and to route relevant recommendations inside Studio.
In Studio the health check lives under Tools → Technology Planning → Ownership & Risk, saved as a technology-environment record. It is recommended when a business reports recurring technical issues, unclear system ownership, vendor dependence, poor documentation or unmanaged integrations. These are the situations where the risk is real but nobody can yet point at it.
The systems-and-ownership inventory stays live in Studio: periodic review prompts ask you to reconfirm owners, and each identified risk can be marked accepted, planned, in progress or resolved. When a support, strategy or engineering conversation eventually happens, the inventory is the starting document rather than a discovery exercise.
When the result points at a constraint that needs professional depth, these engagements pick it up.
Registration is free, no card required, and your results save to your workspace so the working stays in one place.